Two Israeli Pagan movements of the last century have glorified an ancient panteon of god. What is the difference between them? In this lecture we’ve presented both similarities and differences in the relation to deities in the two movements.
The lecture was held at the annual conference of the Israeli Association for the study of Religion on May 4th, 2023.
The conference was dedicatied to the subject of “Deity Gods Goddesses”, and the session where the lecture took place was on “Deities of the Near East”.
The lecture leans on a comparative article on this issue. See links below.
Abstract
In the past century, two movements have glorified pagan mythology in the Land of Israel – the Canaanites, who first formed in the 1940s, and the Neopagans, who have been active since the late 20th century. Both movements opposed the conventional form of “Judaism” in Israel, while reviving and appropriating ancient traditions. However, despite this similarity – their concept of divinity is different (as well as a various other characteristics).
While the Canaanite movement referred to ancient local gods, the neo-pagans in Israel refer to deities from various cultures. The Canaanites worked mainly in the theoretical-literary field, in which they described the worship of nature and the gods, that is, the gods were mainly an idea, a symbol and an expression of values. In contrast, the neo-pagans work through ritualistic vanues and actually go out into nature, alongside their writings. Both movements have secular outlines, but are not really “secular”: the Canaanites ranged between atheism and plain belief, while the neo-pagans psychologize the deity in different ways, while also conduct magic and turn to the goddess.
Other differences concern gender and politics – although the goddess is resurrected in both movements, the initial Canaanite emphasis was on the power of YHWH and his awakening as a symbol of militancy and conflict, out of a nationalist ideology, expressed in male symbols. In contrast, the neo-pagans emphasize the goddess as a symbol of peace and harmony, from a universalist approach, and an emphasis on female symbolism.
Language
Hebrew
Academic/Non-academic
Academic item
Bibliographical citation
It is recommended to use the reference to the published article. See links below.